Visual Defect Detection
Connecting

Quality

Control charts of the reject rate and the defect mix behind it, over the last 24 hours. When a chart goes out of control the usual cause is the line, not the model — a new tool, a different batch of material, a lamp that has aged. Check the line first.

Parts inspected
800
2 stations reporting
First-pass yield
76.9%
Held
9.8%
Rejected
13.4%
Overrides
0.0%
Above 20% for a shift is a signal to review the labels and the threshold

Reject rate, fleet-wide

A p-chart: the control limits move with the subgroup size, so a quiet night shift and a busy day shift are judged on the same terms

In control
0.0%13%27%1 subgroupscentre 13.38%

Defect mix

What the fleet is finding, most common first

Scratch71Dent59Burr18Porosity7Missing hole7Contamination7

Why parts did not pass

Every non-passing decision carries a coded reason. These are the ones that fired

CodeReasonKindParts
201Known defect detected with high confidence.defect107
204Classifier and anomaly model disagree.defect23
202Result is not confident enough to decide automatically.defect15
205Mark found but smaller than the size limit for its class.defect13
103Reflection covers part of the inspected area.evidence12
301Part does not look like anything the model has seen.novelty11
109Camera did not deliver a frame in time.evidence4

By station

One chart per station: a fleet-wide excursion and one station drifting look identical in aggregate

ST-01in control
0.0%12%24%1 subgroupscentre 12.00%
ST-02in control
0.0%15%30%1 subgroupscentre 14.75%