Quality
Control charts of the reject rate and the defect mix behind it, over the last 24 hours. When a chart goes out of control the usual cause is the line, not the model — a new tool, a different batch of material, a lamp that has aged. Check the line first.
Parts inspected
800
2 stations reportingFirst-pass yield
76.9%
Held
9.8%
Rejected
13.4%
Overrides
0.0%
Above 20% for a shift is a signal to review the labels and the thresholdReject rate, fleet-wide
A p-chart: the control limits move with the subgroup size, so a quiet night shift and a busy day shift are judged on the same terms
In control
Defect mix
What the fleet is finding, most common first
Why parts did not pass
Every non-passing decision carries a coded reason. These are the ones that fired
| Code | Reason | Kind | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | Known defect detected with high confidence. | defect | 107 |
| 204 | Classifier and anomaly model disagree. | defect | 23 |
| 202 | Result is not confident enough to decide automatically. | defect | 15 |
| 205 | Mark found but smaller than the size limit for its class. | defect | 13 |
| 103 | Reflection covers part of the inspected area. | evidence | 12 |
| 301 | Part does not look like anything the model has seen. | novelty | 11 |
| 109 | Camera did not deliver a frame in time. | evidence | 4 |
By station
One chart per station: a fleet-wide excursion and one station drifting look identical in aggregate